Participation Of Scholars Of Modern Science In Fiqh Seminars

Participation of Scholars of Modern Sciencein Fiqh Seminars

 

For in depth elucidation of the complexity of modern issues, experts from various fields commanding respect in their own entities are invited to shed light on the details of the issues under discussion and all such experts also take part in the discussions from time time and contribute to the subject of discussion at these seminars.

 

List of Ulama of Contemporary Sciences who have participated in Fiqhi Seminars

 

Name of Experts

Place

1.                 Dr. Awsaf Ahmad

Delhi

2.                 Dr. Fazlur Rahman Faridi

Aligarh

3.                 Dr. K J Munshi

Ahmedabad

4.                 Ehsanul Haq Haqqi

Delhi

5.                 Dr. Ibne Farid

Rampur

6.                 Professor Najmul Hasan

Delhi

7.                 Syed Aminul Hasan Rizvi

Delhi

8.                 Professor Iqbal Ahmad Ansari

Aligarh

9.                 Mr. Syed Hamid

Delhi

10.            Dr. Abdul Haque Ansari

Aligarh

11.            Dr. Abdul Muiz Nizami

Hyderabad

12.            Abdur Rahim Quraishi

Hyderabad

13.            Janab Syed Shahabuddin

Delhi

14.            Professor Shamim Ahmad

Aligarh

15.            Dr. Nijatullah Siddiqee

Aligarh

16.            Professor Afzal Ahmad

Aligarh

17.            Dr. Muhammad Manzoor Alam

Delhi

18.            Dr. Abdul Azim Islahi

Jeddah

19.            Dr. Muhammad Husain Khatkhate

Mumbai

20.            Professor Rahmat Ali

Delhi

21.            Professor Maswood Ahmad

Ahmad abad

22.            Dr. Aslam Parvez

Delhi

23.            Professor Abdur Rahman Mumin

Mumbai

24.            Dr. Amanullah Khan

Aligarh

25.            Dr. Bagh Siraj

Delhi

26.            Professor Tahir Mehmood

Delhi

27.            Professor Abdur Rahim Bijapuri

Aligarh

28.            Raghib Ahsan Advocate

Patna

29.            Salar Muhammad Khan

Delhi

30.            Abdur Rasheed Agwan

Delhi

31.            Professor Abul Fazal Usmani

Aligarh

32.            Engineer Tariq Sajjad

Ranchi

33.            Dr. Abdul Haseeb

Delhi University

34.            Dr.Rahmatullah

Mumbai

35.            Dr. Arshi Khan

Aligarh

36.            Abdul Hannan Chandana

Delhi

37.            Mr. Israr Alam

Delhi

38.            Dr. Shariq Nisar

Bangalore

39.            Dr. Muqeemuddeen

Aligarh

40.            Dr. Muhammad Palath

Kerala

41.            Dr. Waqar Anwar

Delhi

42.            Dr. Zahid Ahmad

Mumbai

43.            Dr. AAA Faizi

Delhi

44.            Professor Shahid Ashraf

 

45.            Mr. Khwaja M Shahid

Delhi

46.            Dr. Syed Masood Ashraf

Aligarh

47.            Mr. E G. Noorani

Mumbai

48.            Mr. Qazi Shah Muhammad Qadri

Hyderabad

49.            Advocate Mushtaq Ahmad

Delhi

50.            Dr. Afzal Wani

Delhi

51.            Dr. Faizan Mustafa

Odissa

52.            Professor Akhtar al wasey

Delhi

53.            Dr. Zafraul Islam Khan

Delhi

54.            Janab M M Dalvi

Mumbai

55.            Janab H K Zaidi

Delhi

56.            Janab S M Aftab

Delhi

57.            Janab Muzahirul Haq

 

58.            Janab Hafeezullah Baig

 

59.            Professor Mahmoud Ali

Delhi

60.            Dr. Hyder Muhiuddin Ghauri

Hyderabad

61.            Dr. Zul Fiqar Azad

Jamia Hamdard Dehi

62.            Dr. Iftekharuddin

Mesco Hyderabad

63.            Dr. Fakhruddin Muhammad

Mesco Hyderabad

64.            Dr. Obaidullah

Jedda

65.            Syed Amanullah

Aligrah

 

After providing information concerning the topic by them, analysis of issues and discussion by them the participants in the seminars get assistance in arriving at decisions. After completion of discussions one sub committee is constituted to prepare the resolutions. The criterion of selection of the committee is that the members of the committee have either written a good research paper on the topic or they have distinguishingly participated in the discussion, or they have wide experience of issuing fatwa. If unanimous opinion could not be achieved during discussion, the representatives holding both opinions are included in the committee. Now this committee produces the resolution in the General Assembly of the invitees of the seminars after more discussion in view of points adduced in discussion and papers and sometimes a few minor changes are introduced at this stage as well. The resolution passed unanimously is mentioned unanimously. In case when the vast majority hold an opinion and a very few persons hold contradictory opinion otherwise, the former opinion is mentioned as the resolution with indication of another point of view of the names of the persons holding the same. And if there are sufficient numbers of the persons holding both the opinions both point of views are equally mentioned indicating the different point of views and the distinguished and significant personalities of both points of views are mentioned. The resolutions produced in the seminars are published without any addition and omission.

 

This is the cautious, just and representative methodology of thought that is adopted for arriving at Shariah rulings.