Participation Of Scholars Of Modern Science In Fiqh Seminars

Participation of Scholars of Modern Science in Fiqhi Seminars


For in depth elucidation of the complexity of modern issues, experts from various fields commanding respect in their own entities are invited to shed light on the details of the issues under discussion and all such experts also take part in the discussions from time time and contribute to the subject of discussion at these seminars.


List of Ulama of Contemporary Sciences who have participated in Fiqhi Seminars


S. No.Name Of  ExpertPlace
1.Dr. Awsaf Ahmad
Delhi
2.Dr. Fazlur Rahman Faridi
Aligarh
3.Dr. K  J  MunshiAhmedabad

4.Ehsanul Haq Haqqi
Delhi
5.Dr. Ibne Farid
Rampur
6.Professor Najmul Hasan
Delhi
7.Syed Aminul Hasan Rizvi
Delhi
8.Professor Iqbal Ahmad AnsariAligarh

9.Mr. Syed Hamid
Delhi


S. No.Name of ExpertPlace
10.Dr. Abdul Haque AnsariAligarh

11.Dr. Abdul Muiz Nizami
Hyderabad
12.Abdur Rahim QuraishiHyderabad

13.Janab Syed Shahabuddin
Delhi
14.Professor Shamim Ahmad
Aligarh
15.Dr. Nijatullah Siddiqee
Aligarh
16.Professor Afzal Ahmad
Aligarh
17.Dr. Muhammad Manzoor Alam
Delhi
18.Dr. Abdul Azim Islahi
Jeddah


S. No.Name of ExpertPlace
19.Dr. Muhammad Husain Khatkhate
Mumbai
20.Professor Rahmat Ali
Delhi
21.Professor Maswood Ahmad
Ahmadabad
22.Dr. Aslam Parvez
Delhi
23.Professor Abdur Rahman Mumin
Mumbai
24.Dr. Amanullah Khan
Aligarh
25.Dr. Bagh Siraj
Delhi
26.Professor Tahir Mehmood
Delhi
27.Professor Abdur Rahim BijapuriAligarh


S. No.Name of ExpertPlace
28.Raghib Ahsan Advocate
Patna
29.Salar Muhammad Khan
Delhi
30.Abdur Rasheed Agwan
Delhi
31.Professor Abul Fazal Usmani
Aligarh
32.Engineer Tariq Sajjad
Ranchi
33.Dr. Abdul Haseeb
Delhi University
34.Dr. Rahmatullah
Mumbai
35.Dr. Arshi Khan
Aligarh
36.Abdul Hannan ChandanaDelhi



S. No.Name of  ExpertPlace
37.Mr. Israr Alam
Delhi
38.Dr. Shariq Nisar
Bangalore
39.Dr. Muqeemuddeen
Aligarh
40.Dr. Muhammad Palath
Kerala
41.Dr. Waqar Anwar
Delhi
42.Dr. Zahid AhmadMumbai

43.Dr. AAA Faizi
Delhi
44.Professor Shahid Ashraf

45.Mr. Khwaja M Shahid
Delhi


S. No.Name of ExpertPlace
46.Dr. Syed Masood AshrafAligarh

47.Mr. E G. Noorani
Mumbai
48.Mr. Qazi Shah Muhammad Qadri
Hyderabad
49.Advocate Mushtaq Ahmad
Delhi
50.Dr. Afzal Wani
Delhi
51.Dr. Faizan Mustafa
Odissa
52.Professor Akhtar al wasey
Delhi
53.Dr. Zafraul Islam Khan
Delhi
54.Janab M M Dalvi
Mumbai


S. NoName of ExpertPlace
55.Janab H K Zaidi
Delhi
56.Janab S M Aftab
Delhi
57.Janab Muzahirul Haq

58.Janab Hafeezullah Baig

59.Professor Mahmoud AliDelhi

60.Dr. Hyder Muhiuddin GhauriHyderabad

61.Dr. Zul Fiqar Azad
Jamia Hamdard, Delhi
62.Dr. Iftekharuddin
Mesco, Hyderabad
63.Dr. Fakhruddin Muhammad
Mesco, Hyderabad


S.No.Name  of ExpertPlace
64.Dr. Obaidullah
Jedda
65.Syed Amanullah
Aligrah






After providing information concerning the topic by them, analysis of issues and discussion by them the participants in the seminars get assistance in arriving at decisions. After completion of discussions one sub committee is constituted to prepare the resolutions. The criterion of selection of the committee is that the members of the committee have either written a good research paper on the topic or they have distinguishingly participated in the discussion, or they have wide experience of issuing fatwa. If unanimous opinion could not be achieved during discussion, the representatives holding both opinions are included in the committee. Now this committee produces the resolution in the General Assembly of the invitees of the seminars after more discussion in view of points adduced in discussion and papers and sometimes a few minor changes are introduced at this stage as well. The resolution passed unanimously is mentioned unanimously. In case when the vast majority hold an opinion and a very few persons hold contradictory opinion otherwise, the former opinion is mentioned as the resolution with indication of another point of view of the names of the persons holding the same. And if there are sufficient numbers of the persons holding both the opinions both point of views are equally mentioned indicating the different point of views and the distinguished and significant personalities of both points of views are mentioned. The resolutions produced in the seminars are published without any addition and omission.


This is the cautious, just and representative methodology of thought that is adopted for arriving at Shariah rulings.